Last week there were two meetings of the artsy kind held in Milwaukee--the Cultural Alliance's Creative Coalition Update Meeting and The State of Art-Open Forum at the Haggerty Museum of Art--neither of which could be attended by Cricky due to a crippling dental problem. In my post reminding y'all of the happenings, I expressed my steadfast belief that those able to make it to these events would let the rest of us know the details of what transpired.
I waited and waited, pain pills in bloodstream, and yet nothing appeared--not anywhere. I got no comments on this here blog. There was nada on the notorious electronic chatterbox known as the Milwaukee Artist Resource Network (MARN) listserv. Zip was the word on Artsy Schmartsy, though he's überbusy right now so we forgive him. Mike Brenner had no snarky commentary to chew on. I knew Mary Louise Schumacher had planned to attend the Haggerty Forum but even her blog remained mute.
To cap it off, there wasn't and still isn't a recap of the Creative Coalition Update Meeting on the Cultural Alliance's website, however, Christine Harris did offered up a brief tweet--is there any other kind?--by stating, "Great meeting last night with 150 very creative folks from MKE region." Sounds swell, but what happened?
Developing a high level of patience is something I've been consciously working on for... well, let's just say a very long time, and after twiddling my brain for some days I finally spied a message posted on the MARN listserv on Saturday authored by local artist Gary John Gresl in regards to The State of Art. Well, Huzzah! I was beginning to think it hadn't gotten off the springboard 'cause turnout was bad and what the hell does it matter if no one's there to hoot 'n' holler for your famous belly flop or off-balance swan dive, huh?
Anyhoo, the first two paragraphs of Gresl's message convey what I pretty much expected but not exactly what I wanted to hear:
"The silence on MARN after last Thursday's Haggerty Museum's panel discussion about the state of art in our state is telling. I think it is strong suggestion that, despite energy and ideas revealed during the event, there will likely be no action or positive results. There were plenty of people there familiar with MARN who might have something to say on this public forum, but apparently what they saw and heard still lies fallow in their brains. Maybe...maybe some few people will record what they heard in their memories and it may influence some actions in the future, but I am inclined to believe it was a nice opportunity to voice ideas and complaints that will bear no fruit.
Why? Because any action will take one or a few individuals to commit to real effort, hard work and hours spent. Unless individuals take responsibility and dedicate energies and time, nothing in any field is accomplished. The status quo remains, or worse, decline sets in. Some few activist individuals have to step forth with ideas and actions...but then working alone can quickly cause burn out, especially when one must try to bend the unbendable."
Kinda depressing, no? I mean, we of the arts and creative community have had one meeting after another here, folks--whether it's been a MARN thingy, a Cultural Alliance thingy or one of these open forum thingys--but we seem to be booked on an excruciatingly slow ocean liner, destination unknown, with a few scattered and sparsely populated islands of workshops and initiatives along the way. Is there a navigation map to be had, 'cause I haven't seen one yet.
As much as I'm a stalwart independent and believe that individual artists have to make decisions based on what's best for each one of them, I admit that I would like this somewhat fructose-tinged togetherness talk to lead somewhere, to some common good, so we can all reap whatever benefits we can. Really I do--I'm an old school socialist from way back, man.
But the time and energy of individuals can only be stretched so thin, and I agree with Mike Brenner's response to Gresl's message when he states that "it comes down to two things. money and participation." It's a hard, cold truth but people need to get compensated to do these things--to organize, to market, to work--otherwise nothing gets done 'cause there just ain't enough of anything in the day/week/month/year if ya can't feed yourself and/or others who depend on you. And if the "arts leaders," as Brenner calls 'em, can't recognize that and set an example by valuing and compensating individual artists and art lovers for the work they do for the cause, then we're up a familiar and aptly named creek without a paddle while facing downwind, kids.
Course, no matter what happens, independent artists will always remain, sometimes barely eking out a living and taking all kinds of jobs when we need to, because that's who and what we are. Once an artist, always an artist, and there's no gettin' out alive.
Clearly the moral of this story is that I've gotta floss more often--and you should, too!--so I won't be forced to miss any microscopic particles of intel that could be imparted during one of these meetings. Maybe I should bring one of those tiny dentist mirrors with me to the next one so I can see if the answers are hiding somewhere deep in the crevices of the usual broad statements and grand overtures.
UPDATE: Cricky reader Judith Ann Moriarty has left a very helpful comment:
"you
really missed the boat! ThirdCoastDigest.com had a great posting by
Brian Jacobsen, the very next morning following the Visual Art blather
at the Haggerty...."
Why, yes he did! And all are free to read it here.
To the remark that I "really missed the boat," all I can say is that pain and drugs will often leave a person stranded on the dock with no actual clue as to what's going on, let alone which boat he/she should board, so I claim sanctuary in the simple nature of humanity.
Related:
Two Nights of Artsy Creative Talk